Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Normative Tables

Published normative score distributions for the PID-5, PID-5-SF, and PID-5-BF, in long form: the raw score and percentile at each T score for the five domain scales, the 25 facet (trait) scales of the full and short forms, and the brief form's total score; and the percentile at each raw score for the validity scales, which are tabled without T scores.

Usage

pid_norms

Format

A tibble with 4606 rows and 5 columns:

version

The PID-5 version the row norms: "FULL", "SF", or "BF"

scale

Name of the scale, as the score-output column stem used by score_pid5() and validity_pid5() (i.e., without their prefix), so a lookup joins to scored output with no crosswalk. Every scale normed here is produced by one of those two functions, the brief form's "total" included (see score_pid5())

tscore

The T score, or NA for the validity scales, whose tables print none

raw

The raw scale score, on the metric score_pid5() and validity_pid5() return: for the FULL and SF domains, the mean of the three primary facet scores (themselves item means, and the facets differ in length, so this is not a mean over the domain's items); for the FULL and SF facets and for the BF domains and total, a mean item response; for the validity scales, an item sum. 42 of the 50 facet columns print raws above the 3.00 a mean of 0-3 items can reach, up to 4.00, and 19 of those repeat their top raw across consecutive T scores; all such rows ship as published and are simply unattainable (see norm_pid5())

percentile

The percentile of the normative distribution at that score, as a proportion between 0 and 1

Source

Markon, K. E., Fossati, A., Somma, A., & Krueger, R. F. (2024). Understanding the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Appendix, Tables A-1 to A-9 (pp. 113-219).

Details

The INC and INCS scales are called the Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN) scale by Markon et al. (2024), so a reader coming from the book will find those tables here under the package's own names.

Markon et al. call the 25 facets trait scales; they are tabled under the book's own captions, which the package maps onto the pid_scales facet names.

Norms come from a sample of 1,082 individuals from a U.S. Census-matched panel. The validity-scale distributions use all 1,082; the FULL and SF domain and facet distributions use the 995 respondents who scored below 17 on the inconsistency scale, left no more than a quarter of responses missing, and did not endorse both infrequency items. The source states no separate sample size for the brief form tables. All T scores and percentiles were computed with sampling weights reflecting U.S. Census data.

The published informant-form tables are not included.

Examples

pid_norms
#> # A tibble: 4,606 × 5
#>    version scale               tscore   raw percentile
#>    <chr>   <chr>                <int> <dbl>      <dbl>
#>  1 FULL    negativeAffectivity     35  0          0   
#>  2 FULL    negativeAffectivity     36  0          0   
#>  3 FULL    negativeAffectivity     37  0.05       0.02
#>  4 FULL    negativeAffectivity     38  0.11       0.04
#>  5 FULL    negativeAffectivity     39  0.17       0.1 
#>  6 FULL    negativeAffectivity     40  0.23       0.16
#>  7 FULL    negativeAffectivity     41  0.28       0.21
#>  8 FULL    negativeAffectivity     42  0.34       0.25
#>  9 FULL    negativeAffectivity     43  0.4        0.29
#> 10 FULL    negativeAffectivity     44  0.46       0.35
#> # ℹ 4,596 more rows